Hi , I am Manish Chauhan Location:Pune, Maharashtra, India I was born and brought up in Lucknow, The City of Nawabs. Graduated (B.Tech) from IIT-Kanpur, Aersospace Engineering. Currently working as a Software professional in Pune, the Queen of Dec
Published on July 29, 2004 By Confusing Musings In Entertainment
It is the 489 pages, 105 chapters thriller by Dan Brown. 

Have finished reading it only today.  Fantastic page turner !  All those usual clichés apart, this one is a bit different murder mystery.  The book has involved tremendous research work of art and history.  As the book progresses,  author puts reader on a hot treasure hunt where clues are in the art work of  Leonardo Da Vinci .  Reader can look forward to learn about the hidden interpretations of Vinci's paintings and inventions,  breaking these clues with use of symbology and cryptology.  One clue leads to another and excitement grows.

Then there is unraveling of  startling facts about the history, which may or may not be true, and the secrecy behind them . These information are  woven into the main story in such a manner that reader is never bored.  Forget the boredom, the reader actually enjoys the stuff and believes  in them.  Details never become tedious and don't bring the pace down.

There are twists and turns in the fortunes where treasure hunt and  frantic chase  hot the things up. The suspense is well maintained till the end (though I somehow sensed it).  Author has marvelously rolled the facts and fiction together and produced a  masterpiece.

Brown may not match the detailing of Alistair McLean or the edge-of-the-seat pace and suspense of Jeffery Archer or the research acumen of Dominique Lapierre and Larry Collins, but he has successfully managed to merge all these elements together to keep the reader completely hooked.

A roadside bookstall walla will cost you just 60 bucks, don't bother about the bookshop.

Comments
on Jul 29, 2004
The DaVinci Code is based on the Gnostic gospels, ficticious gospels written to question the divinity to Christ. The writers of these gospels chose names that would gather attention to them, unlike the names of the writers of the actual gospels. (For example, Luke wrote a gospel, but never saw Christ. He recorded Peter's teachings, though. The Gnostics chose the name Thomas for one of their alleged writers. The goal is quite obvious.)

The book is purely fiction, and as you suggested, the reader can easily forget that. If anyone is interested in understanding arguments for why the book is ficticious and reading more on the subject, I recommend a book called The DaVinci Code: Fact or Fiction by Paul Maier and Hank Hanegraaff. available on www.equip.org.

However his masterful use of prose is, indeed, without question. Almost spellbinding, eh?
on Jul 29, 2004
try reading Umberto Eco's Foucault pendulum. Its known as thinking man's "Da Vinci Code". Email me if you want the ebook for that... and yeah.. EBOOKS are free

Handa
on Jul 29, 2004
Ok Shulamite, will follow the link to verify that. Nice of you enlightening me

Handa, If the ebook is availaible, I would love to have it. Will save some bucks
on Jul 30, 2004
Dan Brown clearly states in a prologue before the beginning of the book that the plotline is FICTION -- but everything to do with the History, the Art, Opeis Day, The Rose, The Holy Grail, and PS -- it's all true - can be documented and has been.
Dan Brown did ALOT of research for all of his books - he lists a bibliography and all the websites mentioned in the book are real - the only fiction is Robert Langdon and the other characters.

Link -- Official Website - Lots of questions answered.

also Jilluser started a discussion about the same book a couple months ago -- Link
on Jul 30, 2004
I have been read Da vinci code yet but your blog makes it so tempting. I will probably read it soon. Did you read Alchemist by Coelho- a grest book, if you are interested in man's quest for the meaning of his self and soul.
on Jul 30, 2004
Jump on it WebPoet as soon as possible
on Jul 30, 2004
I have read it, and it was really interesting book to read.

If you like that, try reading Angels and Demons by same author.
on Jul 30, 2004
I just bought Angels and Demons. I went to buy The DaVinci Code and they said get this one first. I can't wait to into both of them.
on Aug 01, 2004
"Angels and Demons " - next on the list guys
on Aug 01, 2004
Actually, If I've read the credits correctly, Robert Langdon is an actual person...

The artist for the Illuminati brands in "Angels and Demons".

On Angel's Wings,
RFeathers
on Aug 06, 2004
Confusing Musing's English leaves a lot to be desired. "These information are woven"? Surely you should know better than that!
Also, he talks about "interpretation of Vinci's paintings". The person in question is Leonardo. "Da Vinci" merely means that he comes from the province of Vinci. This is like referring to Joan of Arc as just "Arc"!
on Aug 06, 2004
Language Stickler,

I am a Programmer, not a Pro in Grammar. My English leaves a lot to be desired - My English language teacher also used to say that.

My French also leaves a lot be desired. I don't know what is 'Da' or 'Vinci' . I haven't studied French, so that's explain's it. But hey, did you write to Dan Brown as well. Why did he title ' The DA Vinci Code'. Obviously, there were no clues in the place called Vinci ! Next time everyone will ask you to proof read every time one writes a post. Ask Dan Brown also to do so when he writes his next book.

My dear friend the bottom line is - Dikhawon per Mat Jao, Apni Aqal Lagao. I see that your Hindi and Urdu leaves a lot to be desired

Thanks for dropping by.
on Aug 06, 2004
DaVinci is Italian not French -- He called it the DaVinci code because of all the clues in Leonardo DaVinci's artwork. No he didn't go to Vinci - there's no art there -- most of it was in the Lourve -- read the book again if you're still so unclear about it.
on Aug 08, 2004
Hi trina_p

> "No he didn't go to Vinci - there's no art there"

I think you didn't get the hidden sarcasm in my reply. I know he didn't got to Vinci. I was commenting on the naive comments by Language Stickler. I am very well clear about the book

Thanks anyway.